Commentary for a Piece of Original Writing Essay

For my first cull of original writing I particularise to create a plot of ground primarily written for entertainment however, I similarly want to portray an interest into diachronic and political persuasions.I aim to write this turn for an audience of teen timers to young adult who argon aged from around fifteen to twenty-five and are male, I also wish to identify with those interested in political thrillers within this age range. The musical style of which shall be a short fiction story consisting in general of narrative and written in the third mortal. I picture this piece as being one of a collection of short stories bedevil-to doe with with the political-thriller fiction sub-genre. Despite being a fiction school text I aim to tie in real world non-fiction.I was stir to write a story of this nature after watching Luc Bessons The Professional, alongside reading material from Robert Harris, such(prenominal) as archangel, Fatherland and Enigma. I had previous experien ce reading this genre and being a big fan of Robert Ludlum I wanted to emulate the thrill I experienced from his work, in my deliver.To gain a firmer ca custom of the style I would be pursuing I began to view examples of historical references from encyclopedias and journals and I also read books of historical sub-genre.This is my final draft of this piece and I have made various alterations from the previous drafts to enhance it. In general the changes were simple things such as correcting spelling and punctuation, slightly more than significant was the rewording of concluding paragraphs to make it tidier and read or tend better. The most salient modification was trimming the use of figurative phrase its use brings visual framework to the piece however overdoing it resulted in an mortifying read.The changes I have made were a result of feedback I had deliver the goods from my friends, family and potential audiences who read my first drafts and gave me their honest opinions re garding it. I consider the changes I have made prior to completion have accreditedly change the final draft of this piece however, if I were to revise it once over again I could continue to make improvements.This piece has been constructed to exploit the expectations of the reader by diverging from the conventions of traditional story telling beginning, middle and end, respectively. By challenge this system I hope I have created an original piece that intrigues the reader.throughout the piece I have tried to maintain an automatic teller of consternation and to do so I have used many another(prenominal) different grammatical and lexical techniques, for instance the use of certain semantic fields that are common with post cold war Russia such as KGB, Prospekts and Klashnikov AK-47. I have also written using the semantic field of dirt and creating a feeling for the attitudes of the time. Again it can be shown here by smog, sodden and orifice. Together these images draw out up th e feeling of treacherousness and uneasiness. These row also relate to the sociolect of my political thriller enthusiasts that would have come across such words in the past. This gives them a aesthesis of appreciation and common territory.I have chosen certain words to optimize the effect of connotation, exempli gratia I use the word smog in place of fog or haze this is because smog has a colly feeling, again reiterating the industrial power of Russia and the unwelcome feeling of wartime. This is complemented with the word lingered as opposed to stayed as an adverb to describe the smog.Not only have I used the emotive effects of connotation but combined with the use of figurative ornaments such as metaphors and similes e.g. like a sodden puff of air, and alliteration e.g. bald bloated body, I have drawn a picture of waking Moscow through the lexis.To add some mood and variety into the piece I have played around with the pragmatics of certain situations, one of which is when Vl adimir and Nikolai are talking, he and I went back as out-of-the-way(prenominal) as Cuba and we had no secrets. what I have tried to imply is the possibility of Vladimir being homosexual, which Nikolai picks up on and questions in the conversation.At the end of the piece I switch writing from third person into first person I can hear, and their souls, this is so I can comment objectively on the events that had revealed themselves and stimulate the reader to resolve the story according to their own reading of it.The story is presented through narrative prose, using paragraphs to separate the text into more meaningful and accessible sections. Adjacency pairs determine the order of negotiation to replicate that of spoken text.Upon commencing this piece of writing it was my ambition to amuse and please an audience of comparable cultural elation to myself. The desire to write such a piece fired me with zeal and left my feeling quite ebullient.I feel I have successfully completed wha t I set out to do and by recording the response of my sharpen audience to my final piece the consensus was that this was true.