A Man for All Seasons: Play About Thomas More Essay

A Man for all(a) Seasons pen by Robert Bolt is a play ab start a man, doubting Thomas more(prenominal), who lives by his beliefs and eventually dies because of his beliefs. The play has a simple theme, played out through a few main computer addresss. aboundings disposition and personality prevent to a greater extent from being successful. The starting time appearance of fecund in the play happens right away in the first scene. This is the first time you get to see his personality. full-bodied and more have an argument, as to whether every man is capable of being bribed. fertile believes that money, status or women, fire bribe anyone. more than doesnt agree with him completely entirely is intrigued with his belief that a man can be bought with materials. luxuriant is referring to the occurrence that he has read Machiavelli, which More later teases him of. Machiavellis morals atomic number 18 different from Mores. More admires his private conscience above intimacys lik e personal advancement, but Machiavelli gives advice about the opposite. Richs reference to Machiavelli seems to instal that he and Thomas Crom well up will sp are no one to strike success later in the play.At the end of the scene More tells the duke that Rich needs a job, but that he doesnt ineluctably recommend Rich, which displays Mores view of Rich. More is a well respected man, so his opinion on someone would be a valid one. Right from the beginning of the play you can see the engagement between Richs and Mores characters. More plain cares for Richs well being. Richs lust for mightiness and wealth in the end gets the best of him and any kind of focal point or advice given from More is ignored. Its interesting to note that More does care for Rich.In his interaction with Rich in the first scene, More teaches by testing Rich by offering him the goblet, letting Rich know that the goblet was a bribe and is therefore ? dirtied. More understands Richs faults from the beginning o f the play, but he tries to nurture Rich anyway. This is some other excellent example of Mores superior character. Its misfortunate that Rich eventually perjures himself to sentence More to death. A Man for All Seasons focuses on Richs rise in status close as much as it does the take of More.More and his beliefs get him death, duration Rich gains greater status and more and more wealth, at the personify of his friend More. end-to-end the book you can see Rich fall deeper and deeper into his own departure of innocence. At the end of Act One, Rich and Cromwell are having a conversation. Cromwell offers Rich the job as Collector of Revenue in return he wants information about the goblet given to him by More. Rich ? laments that he has woolly-headed his innocence, Im Lamenting. Ive lost my innocence (44). The scene seems to show that Rich has sold his soul to the Devil. In this scene Rich isnt entirely sure about what he is doing which shows that at this point there is still so me humanity leftfield in him. The final fall of Richs character occurs at the end of the play when Rich takes the stand at Mores trial. Rich is asked to avouch about his conversation with More before the trial on what Mores stance was on what the King was doing. Rich says, Parliament has make our King Head of the Church. Why will you not accept him? indeed he said parliament had no power to do it (94). By perjuring against More he has pulled the final straw and officially hands himself over to greed and lust for power. Mores standout character is shown once again when he says to Rich, In good faith, Rich, I am sorrier for your perjury than my peril. In the end for perjuring against More Rich is given the job of attorney normal of Wales. Throughout the play we see the fall of Thomas More and the boost of Rich. The contrast of Richs gain in status and Mores loss of status, really makes the play.It seems that the author doesnt try to make his characters stand for anyone thing i n particular, but in Richs case he is a symbol of the tendency to surrender to the temptation of wealth and status. Throughout the play you never get any real depth of Rich as a person. This seems to be what the author is trying to do because Rich works as a perfect contrast to More without winning anything away from Mores character. Without the contrast of Richs character we wouldnt get to see who More really is. Richs character shows us all what impact money and status can have on us.